More Information

Submitted: February 20, 2024 | Approved: March 18, 2024 | Published: March 19, 2024

How to cite this article: Hamal H. Approximation of Kantorovich-type Generalization of (p,q) - Bernstein type Rational Functions Via Statistical Convergence. Int J Phys Res Appl. 2024; 7: 019-025.

DOI: 10.29328/journal.ijpra.1001080

Copyright License: © 2024 Hamal H. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Keywords: (p,q) – calculus; Bernstein operators; Balázs-Szabados operators; Satistical convergence

FullText PDF

Approximation of Kantorovich-type Generalization of (p,q) - Bernstein type Rational Functions Via Statistical Convergence

Hayatem Hamal*

Department of Mathematics, Tripoli University, Tripoli 22131, Libya

*Address for Correspondence: Hayatem Hamal, Department of Mathematics, Tripoli University, Tripoli 22131, Libya, Email: hafraj@yahoo.com

In this paper, we use the modulus of continuity to study the rate of A-statistical convergence of the Kantorovich-type (p,q) - analogue of the Balázs–Szabados operators by using the statistical notion of convergence.

Mathematics subject classification: Primary 4H6D1; Secondary 4H6R1; 4H6R5.

Bernstein type rational functions, R n ( f;x )= 1 ( 1+ a n x ) n k=0 n f( k b n ) ( n k ) ( a n x ) k    ( n=1, 2, ... ) Balázs defined and investigated them in 1975, (see [1]). In this definition, f is a real and single-valued function defined on the interval [0,∞), an and bn are real numbers that have been appropriately chosen and are independent of x. Seven years later, in 1982, Balázs and Szabados cooperated to improve the estimate in [1] by selecting appropriate parameters an and bn under some restrictions for f(x), (see[2]).

Recently, different q - generalizations of Balázs-Szabados operators have been studied by several researchers, see [3-7]. In [8], the Kantorovich-type q - analogue of the Balázs-Szabados operators is defined by Hamal and Sabancigil as follows:

R n,q ( f,x )= k=0 n r n,k ( q,x ) 0 1 f( [ k ] q + q k t b n ) d q t, (1)

where

f:[ 0, ), q( 0,1 ),  a n = [ n ] q β1 , b n = [ n ] q β ,0<β 2 3 ,n,x0,

and

r n,k ( q,x )= 1 ( 1+ a n x ) n [ n k ] q ( a n x ) k s=0 nk1 ( 1+( 1q ) [ s ] q a n x ) .

Additionally, the fast rise of (p,q) - calculus has encouraged many mathematicians in this subject to discover different generalizations. In the last decade, Mursaleen et al. defined and studied the analogue of many operators (see [9-15]). The (p,q) - generalization of Szász–Mirakjan operators was studied by Acar (see [16]), (p,q) - Kantorovich modification of Bernstein operators was studied by Acar and Aral (see [17]).

In [18-20], recently, Hamal and Sabancigil introduced a new Kantorovich-type (p,q) - analogue of the Balázs–Szabados operators by generalizing the new Kantorovich-type q - analogue of Balázs–Szabados operators, given by (1), as follows:

R n,p,q ( f,x )= k=0 n r n,k ( p,q,x ) 0 1 f ( p nk ( [ k ] p,q + q k t ) b n )   d p,q t ,   (2)

where

r n,k ( p,q,x )= 1 p n( n1 ) /2 [ n k ] p,q p k( k1 ) /2 ( a n x 1+ a n x ) k   j=0 nk1 ( p j q j a n x 1+ a n x )

and

0<q<p1,  a n = [ n ] p,q β1 ,  b n = [ n ] p,q β ,  0<β 2 3 , n, x0,  f:[ 0, ).

These newly defined operators have some advantages when they are compared with the other (p,q) - analogues given in the other studies. The first advantage is that they are positive for all continuous and real-valued functions on the half-open interval [0,∞). The second advantage is that they can be used to approximate also the integrable functions. If p = 1, these polynomials reduce to the new Kantorovich-type analogue of the Balázs–Szabados operators, which are defined by Hamal and Sabancigil in [8]. Moreover, we considered the following two special cases:

• If 0<p<q≤1 or 1≤p<q<∞ or when the positivity property of the operators fails.

• If 1≤p<q<∞ then approximation by the new operators R n,p,q ( f,x ) becomes difficult because if p is large enough then the sequence { R n,p,q } n may diverge.

Before stating the main result for these operators, we give some notations and definitions of (p,q) - calculus. For any p>0, q>0 non-negative integer n, the (p,q) - integer of the number n is defined as follows:

[ n ] p,q = p n1 + p n2 q+ p n3 q 2 +...+p q n2 + q n1 ={ p n q n pq       if pq1   n p n1         if p=q1   [ n ] q          if p=1    n            if p=q=1 ,

the (p,q) - factorial is defined by

[ n ] p,q != k=1 n [ k ] p,q n1   and   [ 0 ] p,q !=1,

and (p,q) - binomial coefficient is defined by

[ n k ] p,q = [ n ] p,q ! [ k ] p,q ! [ nk ] p,q ! 0kn.

The formula of (p,q) - binomial expansion is defined by

( ax+by ) p,q n = k=0 n p (nk)(nk1) 2 q k(k1) 2 a nk b k x nk y k =( ax+by )( pax+qby )( p 2 ax+ q 2 by )...( p n1 ax+ q n1 by ).

Let f:C[0,a],

Let f:C[0,a], the (p,q) - integral of is defined by:

0 a f(t) d p,q t=(pq)a k=0 f( q k p k+1 a ) q k p k+1  if  | p q |>1 

Fast [21] and Fridy [22] provided the following notions.

Suppose that E={ 1, 2, ... } and E n ={ kn:kE }. . Then δ( E )= lim n 1 n | E n | is called the natural density of E provided that the limit exists.

Definition 1: A sequence x = (xn) is statistically convergent to the number L if for every ε>0, we have δ{ k:| x k L |ε }=0 is denoted by s t A lim n x n =L .

Because all finite subsets of the natural numbers have density zero, any convergent sequence is statistically convergent, but not contrariwise.

For example, consider the sequence A = {an, n = 1,2,3…} whose terms are

a n ={ n   when  n= m 2 , m=1, 2, 3,... 1    otherwise 

We can see that the sequence is divergent in the ordinary sense, but it is statistically convergent to 1.

Let CB [a,b] denote the space of all functions f which are continuous in every point of the interval [a,b] and bounded on the entire positive real line, | f( x ) | M f ,x( 0, ) .

Lemma 1 ([10]): For all Let n, x[ 0, ) and 0

R n,p,q ( 1,x )=1.

R n,p,q ( t,x )= p n [ 2 ] p,q b n + 2q [ 2 ] p,q ( x 1+ a n x )

R n,p,q ( t 2 ,x )= p 2n [ 3 ] p,q b n 2 + ( 4 q 3 +5 q 2 p+3q p 2 ) p n1 [ 2 ] p,q [ 3 ] p,q b n ( x 1+ a n x )                   + q [ n1 ] p,q [ n ] p,q 4 q 3 + q 2 p+q p 2 [ 2 ] p,q [ 3 ] p,q ( x 1+ a n x ) 2 .

Lemma 2 ([10]): For all n, x[ 0, )

( R n,p,q ( (tx),x ) ) 2 1 b n { 1 b n + ( p n q n ) 2 b n ( 1 p+q + 1 pq ( a n x ) ) 2 }, x[ 0, ), (3)

R n,p,q ( ( tx ) 2 ,x ) A 1 b n ϕ n ( p,q ) ( 1+x ) 2 ,x[ 0, ), (4)

R n,p,q ( ( tx ) 4 ,x )   A 2 b n 2 ( 1+x ) 2 ,  x[ 0, ), (5)

Where A1 > 0, A2 > 0 and ϕ n ( p,q )=max{ p n1 ,  b n a n p n1 ,  1 [ 3 ] p,q b n }.

In the following theorem, the Bohman –Korovkin type statistical approximation theorem was proved by Gadjiev and Orhan [23].

Theorem 1 ([13]): Let ( n ) n be a sequence of positive linear operators acting from CB [a,b] to B [a,b] that is, n : C B [ a,b ]B[ a,b ] satisfies the conditions that

s t A lim n ( e i ) e i =0  with  e i ( t )= t i  and  i=0, 1, 2. (6)

Then, we have

s t A lim n n ff =0   , f C B ( [ a,b ] ).

Now, we give the main result of this research is to use the modulus of continuity to study the rate of A-statistical convergence of Kantorovich-type (p,q) - analogue of the Balázs–Szabados operators R n,p,q ( f,x ) .

Theorem 2: Let q=( q n ),p=( p n ), 0< q n < p n 1 such that s t A lim n q n =1,s t A lim n p n =1 and s t A lim n p n n =1 . Then for each compact interval [ 0,b ][ 0, ) , we have s t A lim n R n,p,q ( f,x )f( x ) =0 ,   fC( [ 0,b ] ) .

Proof: According to Theorem 1, it is sufficient to show that it satisfies (6). By using Lemma 1, it is clear that

s t A lim n R n, p n, q n ( e 0 ;x ) e 0 =0 , since  R n, p n, q n ( e 0 ;x )=1. (7)

Again by Lemma 1, we have

| R n, p n, q n ( e 1 ;x ) e 1 |=| p n n [ 2 ] p,q b n + 2 q n [ 2 ] p n, q n ( x 1+ a n, p n, q n x )x |                            = p n n [ 2 ] p n, q n b n + ( p n q n ) [ 2 ] p n, q n x 1+ a n, p n, q n x + a n, p n, q n x 2 1+ a n, p n, q n x .

By taking the maximum of both sides of the last equality on [0,b] with 0<b< 1 a n, p n , q n , we obtain

R n, p n, q n ( e 1 ;x ) e 1 p n n [ 2 ] p n, q n b n + ( p n q n ) [ 2 ] p n, q n b 1+ a n, p n, q n b + a n, p n, q n b 2 1+ a n, p n, q n b .

By using the limits s t A lim n q n =1,s t A lim n p n =1 , we have

herefore,

R n, p n, q n ( e 1 ;x ) e 1 <ε.

For ε>0, we define the sets

A:={ nN: R n, p n, q n ( e 1 ;. ) e 1 ε }, (8)

A 1 ={ n: p n n [ 2 ] p n, q n b n ε }, A 2 ={ n: ( p n q n ) [ 2 ] p n, q n b 1+ a n, p n, q n b ε }, and

A 3 ={ n: a n, p n, q n b 2 1+ a n, p n, q n b ε }, thus from (8), we can see that A A 1 A 2 A 3 ,

δ{ nN: R n, p n, q n ( e 1 ;. ) e 1 ε }δ{ n: p n n1 b n, p n, q n b 1+ a n, p n, q n b ε 3 }                                                   +δ{ n:( 1 1 ( 1+ a n, p n, q n b ) 2 ) b 2 ε 3 }

+δ{ n: p n n1 ` [ n ] p n, q n b 2 ( 1+ a n, p n, q n b ) 2 ε 3 }. (9)

By taking the limit of both sides of the above inequality (9), It is obvious that

s t A lim n p n n1 b n, p n, q n b 1+ a n, p n, q n b =0, s t A lim n 1 ( 1+ a n, p n, q n b ) 2 =1,

s t A lim n p n n1 ` [ n ] p n, q n b 2 ( 1+ a n, p n, q n b ) 2 =0.

Which implies

s t A lim n R n, p n, q n ( e 1 ;x ) e 1 =0 . (10)

Also, by using Lemma 1, we may write

| R n, p n, q n ( e 2 ;x ) e 2 || p n 2n [ 3 ] p n , q n b n 2 + ( 4 q n 3 +5 q n 2 p n +3 q n p n 2 ) p n n1 [ 2 ] p n , q n [ 3 ] p n , q n b n ( x 1+ a n, p n , q n x ) |                                | + q n [ n1 ] p n , q n [ n ] p n , q n 4 q n 3 + q n 2 p n + q n p n 2 [ 2 ] p n , q n [ 3 ] p n , q n ( x 1+ a n, p n , q n x ) 2 x 2 | .

p n 2n [ 3 ] p n , q n b n, p n , q n 2 + ( 4 q n 3 +5 q n 2 p n +3 q n p n 2 ) p n n1 [ 2 ] p n , q n [ 3 ] p n , q n b n, p n , q n ( x 1+ a n x )

+{ 1 4 q n 3 + q n 2 p n + q n p n 2 [ 2 ] p n , q n [ 3 ] p n , q n 1 ( 1+ a n, p n , q n ) 2 } x 2 + p n n1 [ n ] p n , q n 4 q n 3 + q n 2 p n + q n p n 2 [ 2 ] p n , q n [ 3 ] p n , q n ( x 1+ a n x ) 2

By taking the maximum of both sides of the last equality on [0,b] with 0<b< 1 a n, p n , q n , we get

R n, p n, q n ( e 2 ;x ) e 2 p n 2n [ 3 ] p n , q n b n, p n , q n 2 + ( 4 q n 3 +5 q n 2 p n +3 q n p n 2 ) p n n1 [ 2 ] p n , q n [ 3 ] p n , q n b n, p n , q n ( b 1+ a n, p n , q n b )

+{ 1 4 q n 3 + q n 2 p n + q n p n 2 [ 2 ] p n , q n [ 3 ] p n , q n 1 ( 1+ a n, p n , q n b ) 2 } b 2 + p n n1 [ n ] p n , q n 4 q n 3 + q n 2 p n + q n p n 2 [ 2 ] p n , q n [ 3 ] p n , q n ( b 1+ a n, p n , q n b ) 2

By using the limits s t A lim n q n =1,s t A lim n p n =1 , we have

s t A lim n 4 q n 3 + q n 2 p n + q n p n 2 [ 2 ] p n , q n [ 3 ] p n , q n =1, s t A lim n p n n1 [ n ] p n , q n =0, s t A lim n p n 2n [ 3 ] p n , q n b n, p n , q n 2 =0.

Therefore,

R n, p n, q n ( e 2 ;x ) e 2 <ε.

Now, for given ε > 0, we introduce the following sets;

D:={ nN: R n, p n, q n ( e 2 ;. ) e 2 ε },

D 1 ={ n: p n 2n [ 3 ] p n , q n b n, p n , q n 2 ε 4 },   D 2 ={ n: ( 4 q n 3 +5 q n 2 p n +3 q n p n 2 ) p n n1 [ 2 ] p n , q n [ 3 ] p n , q n b n, p n , q n ( b 1+ a n, p n , q n b ) ε 4 },

D 3 ={ n:{ 1 4 q n 3 + q n 2 p n + q n p n 2 [ 2 ] p n , q n [ 3 ] p n , q n 1 ( 1+ a n, p n , q n b ) 2 } b 2 ε 4 },

D 4 ={ n: p n n1 [ n ] p n , q n 4 q n 3 + q n 2 p n + q n p n 2 [ 2 ] p n , q n [ 3 ] p n , q n ( b 1+ a n, p n , q n b ) 2 ε 4 }.

Then, from (11) we may write D D 1 D 2 D 3 D 4 ,

δ{ nN: R n, p n, q n ( e 2 ;. ) e 2 ε }δ{ n: p n 2n [ 3 ] p n , q n b n, p n , q n 2 ε 4 }                                                   +δ{ n: ( 4 q n 3 +5 q n 2 p n +3 q n p n 2 ) p n n1 [ 2 ] p n , q n [ 3 ] p n , q n b n, p n , q n ( b 1+ a n, p n , q n b ) ε 4 }                                                    + δ{ n:{ 1 4 q n 3 + q n 2 p n + q n p n 2 [ 2 ] p n , q n [ 3 ] p n , q n 1 ( 1+ a n, p n , q n b ) 2 } b 2 ε 4 }

+δ{ n: p n n1 [ n ] p n , q n 4 q n 3 + q n 2 p n + q n p n 2 [ 2 ] p n , q n [ 3 ] p n , q n ( b 1+ a n, p n , q n b ) 2 ε 4 },

by taking the limit of both sides of the above inequality, It is obvious that

δ( D )δ( D 1 )+δ( D 2 )+δ( D 3 )+δ( D 4 )=0 , which implies

s t A lim n R n, p n, q n ( e 2 ;x ) e 2 =0. . As a result, Equation (6) is proven, yielding the desired result.

In this paper, by using the notion of (p,q) - calculus and statistical convergence, we give the main result of this research to use the modulus of continuity to study the rate of A-statistical convergence of Kantorovich type (p,q) - analogue of the Balázs–Szabados operators.

  1. Balázs K. Approximation by Bernstein type rational function. Acta Math Acad Sci Hungar. 1975; 26; 123-134.
  2. Balázs K, Szabados J. Approximation by Bernstein type rational function II. Acta Math Acad Sci Hungar. 1982; 40: 331-337.
  3. Doğru O. On Statistical Approximation Properties of Stancu type bivariate generalization of Balázs-Szabados operators. Proceedings. Int. Conf. on Numer. Anal. and Approx. Theory Cluj-Napoca, Romania. 2006; 179-194.
  4. İspir N, ӧzkan EY. Approximation Properties of Complex Balázs-Szabados Operators in Compact Disks. J Inequal Appl. 2013; 361.
  5. Mahmudov NI. Approximation Properties of the Balázs-Szabados Complex Operators in the case. Comput. Methods Funct Theory. 2016; 16: 567-583.
  6. Özkan EY. Approximation Properties of Kantorovich type Balázs-Szabados operators. Demonstr Math. 2019; 52: 10-19.
  7. Mahmudov NI, Sabancigil P. Approximation Theorems for Bernstein-Kantorovich Operators. 2013; 27(4): 721-730.
  8. Hamal H, Sabancigil P. Some Approximation Properties of new Kantorovich type analogue of Balazs-Szabados Operators. Journal of Inequalities and Applications.2020; 159.
  9. Mursaleen M, Ansari KJ, Khan A. On (p,q) - analogue of Bernstein operators. Appl Math Comput. 2015; 266; 874–882.
  10. Mursaleen M, Sarsenbi AM, Khan T. On (p,q)-analogue of two parametric Stancu-Beta operators. J Inequal Appl 2016; 190: 1-15.
  11. Mursaleen M, Khan F, Khan A. Statistical approximation for new positive linear operators of Lagrange type. Appl Math Comput. 2014; 232: 548–558.
  12. Mursaleen M, Ansari KJ, Khan A. Approximation by (p,q)-Lorentz polynomials on a compact disk. Complex Anal Oper Theory. 2016; 10: 1725-1740.
  13. Mursaleen M, Nasiruzzaman M, Khan A, Ansari KJ. Some approximation results on Bleimann-Butzer-Hahn operators defined by (p,q)-integers. Filomat. 2016; 30: 639–648.
  14. Mursaleen M, Ansari KJ, Khan A. Some approximation results for Bernstein-Kantorovich operators based on (p,q)-calculus. UPB Sci Bull Ser A Appl Math Phys. 2016; 78:129–142.
  15. Mursaleen M, Ansari KJ, Khan A. Some approximation results by (p,q)-analogue of Bernstein-Stancu operators. Appl Math Compt. 2015; 246: 392-402. Corrigendum: Appl Math Comput. 2015; 269: 744-746.
  16. Acar T, Aral A, Mohiuddine SA. On Kantorovich modification of (p,q)-Baskakov operators. J Inequal Appl. 2016; 98. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13660-016-1045-9.
  17. Acar T, Aral A, Mohiuddine SA. On Kantorovich modification of (p,q) - Bernstein operators. Iran J Sci Technol Trans. A Sci. 2018; 42: 1459–1464.
  18. Özkan EY, İspir N. Approximation by (p,q)-Analogue of Balázs-Szabados Operators. Filomat. 2018; 32: 2257–2271.
  19. Hamal H, Sabancigil P. Some Approximation properties of new (p,q) - analogue of Balazs-Szabados Operators. Journal of Inequalities and Applications. 2021; 162.
  20. Hamal H, Sabancigil P. Kantorovich Type Generalization of Bernstein Type Rational Functions Based on (p,q) – Integers. symmetry. 2022; 14.
  21. Fast H. On statistical convergence /Sur la convergence statistigue, Colloquium Mathematicum. 1951; 2: 241-244.
  22. Fridy JA. On statistical convergence. Journal analysis. 1985; 5: 301-313.
  23. Gadjiev AD, Orhan C. Some approximation theorems via statistical convergence approximation. Rocky Mountain Journal of Mathematics. 2002; 32: 129-138.