Cyclical Cosmology, Energy and Curvature of Space-Time

Cyclical cosmic conditions illuminate profound philosophical and physical implications regarding the fundamental nature of the universe. From this perspective, a singularity could actually symbolize a transformation of the underlying structures and laws of our universe, providing insights into the relationships among energy, curvature, and existence of the universe itself. In cyclical cosmology, the universe can be understood as existing in two distinct states: a static potential state and an active kinetic state. Quantum mechanics also reinforces the belief that even in seemingly empty spaces, vacuum fluctuations and differences in potential can give rise to emergent phenomena.

In the realm of physics, energy is a scalar quantity that signifies the ability to perform work or initiate changes both at microcosmic and macrocosmic scales, appearing in various forms such as kinetic and potential energy. Understanding the dynamics of energy is essential for comprehending the evolution of the universe, especially through the interlinkages between energy density and the curvature of space-time. The following equation-

E – Rc⁴ = 0 (1)

Which has been derived from:

$R=\frac{E}{c^4}$ [1] (2)

Captures this connection by relating Total Energy E, the Speed of light C, and the Ricci scalar curvature R of spacetime. This formula profoundly illustrates that energy is intrinsically connected to the curvature of space-time, indicating that the energy density within any area corresponds to the geometry of space-time, a key principle projected in Einstein's theory of general relativity [2]. This theory asserted that mass and energy influence the curvature of space-time, which in turn affects the movement of matter and energy within it. In the field of cosmology, the curvature of space-time, as characterized by the Ricci scalar (R), varies based on the distribution of matter and energy throughout the universe. During cosmic expansion, the Ricci scalar can diminish, reflecting changes in energy distribution and the geometry of the universe. This dynamic relationship between energy and curvature echoes Einstein’s renowned E = mc², where mass is viewed as equivalence or another variant of energy. By extending this equivalence,

E = Rc⁴ (3)

links energy to the geometry of space-time [3], demonstrating that as curvature intensifies, such as in the formation of a black hole, energy must also escalate correspondingly and proportionately. This suggests that in contexts of significant space-time curvature, energy density becomes highly concentrated, leading to the state of singularities where physical laws begin to falter, causing traditional notions of space and time to disintegrate.

Such cosmic conditions illuminate profound philosophical and physical implications regarding the fundamental nature of the universe. If the curvature of space-time increases indefinitely, energy must similarly compress into extreme densities, hinting at a singular state of the universe where the typical structure of time and space is massively disrupted [4,5]. Singularities, thus, inspire philosophical contemplation about whether they signify the actual endpoint of the universe or transitional phases, potentially giving birth to new universes. From this perspective, a singularity could actually symbolize a transformation of the underlying structures and laws of our universe, providing insights into the relationships among energy, curvature, and existence of the universe itself [6].

The inclusion of c⁴ in the equation emphasizes the intensity of the relationship between energy and curvature. It serves as a means of conveying the immense force and importance of energy in its interactions with the universe's structure. It implies that even little amounts of energy can produce notable changes in the behavior of space and time by multiplying spacetime curvature by c⁴. Therefore, the speed of light serves not only as the velocity of light but also as a fundamental mediating element in the unification of space, time, and energy, which is evident in numerous physical equations. In fact, c4 amplifies the influence of energy on the curvature of spacetime, highlighting that even minor changes in energy can considerably distort the fabric of the universe. This interconnection of space-time, mass, and energy prompts us to ponder whether constants like c are simply numerical values or are fundamental inherent truths about the nature of reality.

Furthermore, the pivotal role of c⁴ reinforces the notion that time and space are intricately linked with energy, raising inquiries about whether they are mere constructs or possess an existence independent of our perception. Time is frequently viewed as arising from interactions involving gravity and energy in quantum gravity theories that aim to unify general relativity and quantum mechanics [7]. Moreover, Space-time’s curvature, quantified by the Ricci scalar R, reveals how energy shapes the universe’s structure, with energy’s influence over curvature implying that existence itself may rely on these mutual energetic interactions. This perspective suggests that the universe is not static but an intricate interplay of energy, matter, and form Energy, often regarded as a life force, governs the cosmos’s evolution. Thus, the universe might not only be composed of measurable quantities but may embody a profound interconnectedness of phenomena that hints at a deeper, perhaps transcendental, reality. The constants and structures in physical laws suggest a universal order, raising questions about the presence of a cosmic intelligence or harmony that organizes the universe’s evolution.

Cyclical cosmology: Potential to kinetic universe

Some prominent cosmological models, including the wave function [8] and the Big Bounce hypotheses, suggest that the universe alternates between expansion (kinetic energy) and contraction (potential energy). Every "cycle" is a new universe that arises from the demise of an earlier one. In cyclical cosmology, the universe can be understood as existing in two distinct states: a static potential state and an active kinetic state. In the initial state of potential, time as we know it may be entirely non-existent, with space harboring dormant particles like gravitons, bosons, and fermions in an inactive form. These unmanifested particles connote a universe poised for real action. The shift to a kinetic state happens when interactions among gravitons and fermions commence, leading to the bending of space-time and allowing the emergence of time and causality. Time is viewed as a component of a four-dimensional spacetime in the context of special and general relativity. In this way, the four-dimensional spacetime manifold treats time as one of its fundamental Basis vectors, which also has profound philosophical and spiritual significance highlighted in the scripture and verses of the Indian religion of Saints (Sant Mat, Dayalbagh: Ra-Dha-Sva-Aa-Mi), [9]. This further implies that time is a result of energetic interactions instead of being a fixed entity, resulting in a universe where time progresses and structures evolve and develop [10]. This perspective is consistent with quantum field theory, which posits that potential fields saturate space, and the interactions between particles convert these fields into observable forces and matter. Therefore, the initial Constructive Resonance [11] between gravitons and fermions could represent the inception of time and cosmic structures, linking the beginnings of fundamental forces with the appearance of an observable universe.

Role of gravitons

As fermions and gravitons resonate together, they cause space-time to curve, heralding the emergence of universal gravity and the conversion of time into a quantifiable measure [12]. The notion that gravitons were present in a potential universe resonates with ongoing attempts to merge gravity with quantum theory. This perspective suggests that gravitons, functioning as the carriers of gravitational force, played a crucial role in shaping the universe's initial structure, directing its transition from a dormant to an active kinetic state, similar to cosmic inflation, where the abrupt release of potential energy triggered the expansion of space-time. In order for the universe to transition into a kinetic state, an event or condition, such as a quantum fluctuation, symmetry breaking, or some primordial energy input, could potentially initiate interactions between gravitons and fermions, resulting in the manifestation of gravity as a force. This means that the early universe, which was probably abundant in gravitons and fermions, evolved into a dynamic state, with fundamental particles lying dormant until they activated under specific conditions [13,14]. This idea brings together concepts from particle physics and cosmology, illustrating how time, causality, and structure may have arisen within a previously timeless universe.

Role of photons

In the general relativity postulate as well, energy, including that carried by massless particles like photons, plays a role in creating space-time curvature. Although photons are massless, their energy and momentum still impact the fabric of space-time. In high-energy scenarios, photons can engage with and affect each other, creating effects similar to gravity through quantum phenomena such as photon-photon scattering. Elevated energy densities enable photons to jointly bend space-time in a manner akin to that of gravitons. Furthermore, under certain circumstances, photons can convert into particle-antiparticle pairs through a process known as pair production, which briefly introduces fermionic characteristics. This transformation indicates that even amid a low-energy future akin to the Heat death condition of the universe, infrequent high-energy photon interactions could facilitate the emergence of fermionic states, adding complexity to otherwise static environments, transiting into the formation of a new universe under conformal cyclical evolution (Roger Penrose).

Moreover, quantum field theory illustrates how particles interact within fields, even in nearly empty states. Variations in vacuum energy permit temporary pairs of particles and antiparticles to appear, implying that the universe's potential state is not completely inactive but instead teeming with hidden activity. When electromagnetic principles are scaled up to cosmic perspectives, they imply that photon coherence under specific conditions could promote these interactions. According to general relativity, the Einstein field equations show that any form of energy, including photons, can affect gravitational fields, indicating that even small amounts of energy density might create localized curvatures in space-time. This interplay of vacuum fluctuations, coherence, and quantum phenomena suggests that heat death often deemed a terminal state, may not be definitive. Rather, the capacity for coherent behavior or hidden energy fluctuations hints at the idea that even in a heat-death universe, subtle interactions could lead to the emergence of new conditions or events.

Quantum mechanics reinforces the belief that even in seemingly empty spaces, vacuum fluctuations and differences in potential can give rise to emergent phenomena. Coherence among photons, as seen in Bose-Einstein condensates [15] where particles share the same ground state, could lead to new collective characteristics. In a far-off future, if photons attain sufficient coherence or density, they might display properties that allow for further interactions or energy exchanges. This implies that potential differences in a heat-death universe might sustain a dynamic equilibrium, with small fluctuations preserving the universe in a state of underlying activity.

Consequently, a more complex perspective on the prospective future of the universe indicates that residual energy and quantum effects could maintain minimal activity even after reaching heat death. This perspective challenges the idea of a completely inert universe and prompts inquiries about the ultimate destiny of reality, suggesting that the cosmos may persist in a state of fundamental potential. Instead of arriving at a final conclusion, the universe might embody an ongoing, concealed dynamism with the ability for new interactions and structures to emerge, subtly questioning our perceptions of the emergence of time [7,16-18], space, and existence within the cosmos.

The author is profoundly grateful to the Revered Chairman of, the Advisory Committee on Education, Dayalbagh Educational Institutions, Prof. P.S. Satsangi Sahab, ‘Father of Systems Movement’ in India, for his continued guidance in shaping research aptitude and academic endeavors.

1. Bhushan S. Energy transformation and the emergence of space-time: A classical-quantum unified framework. Phys Int. 2024;15(1):1-6. Available from: https://doi.org/10.3844/pisp.2024.1.6
2. Einstein A. Relativity: The special and general theory. New York: H. Holt and Company; 1920. Available from: https://www.ibiblio.org/ebooks/Einstein/Einstein_Relativity.pdf
3. Jacobson T. Thermodynamics of spacetime: The Einstein equation of state. Phys Rev Lett. 1995;75(7):1260-3. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.75.1260
4. Penrose R. Gravitational collapse and space-time singularities. Phys Rev Lett. 1965;14(3):57-9. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.14.57
5. Hawking S. A brief history of time. New York: Bantam Books; 1988.
6. Penrose R. Cyclic cosmology and the arrow of time. Int J Mod Phys D. 2010;19(14):2321-33.
7. Gambini R, Pullin J. The emergence of classical time from a quantum gravity perspective. Int J Mod Phys D. 2009;18(3):319-29.
8. Hartle JB, Hawking SW. Wave function of the universe. Phys Rev D. 1983;28(12):2960-75. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.28.2960
9. Dayalbagh Educational Institute. Discourse by Rev. Prof. P.S. Satsangi Sahab. 2024 Feb 25. Available from: https://www.dei.ac.in/dei/edei/files/2024/Discourse_Rev_Prof_PS_Satsangi_Sahab_25_02_2024.pdf
10. Rovelli C. Emergent time and the origin of time’s arrow. Found Phys. 2012;42(10):1062-76.
11. Bhushan S. Universal matter synthesis and management via constructive resonance: Pioneering advancements in physical sciences and applied systems. Int J Fundam Phys Sci. 2023;13(3):30-40. Available from: https://doi.org/10.14331/ijfps.2023.330160
12. Barbour JB. Time and quantum gravity: Philosophical perspectives. Stud Hist Philos Mod Phys. 2020;72:20-33.
13. Sakharov AD. Vacuum quantum fluctuations in curved space and the theory of gravitation. Sov Phys Dokl. 1967;12(11):1040-1. Available from: https://ayuba.fr/pdf/sakharov_qvf.pdf
14. Verlinde E. On the origin of gravity and the laws of Newton. J High Energy Phys. 2011;2011(4):29. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP04(2011)029
15. Einstein A. Quantentheorie des einatomigen idealen Gases. Sitzungsber Preuss Akad Wiss. 1925;1:3. Available from: https://www.scirp.org/reference/referencespapers?referenceid=3281121
16. Callender C. What makes time special? Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2017. Available from: https://global.oup.com/academic/product/what-makes-time-special-9780198797302?cc=us&lang=en&
17. Anderson E. The problem of time in quantum gravity. Found Phys. 2017;47(3):174-203.
18. Smolin L. Three roads to quantum gravity. New York: Basic Books; 2001. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/252914350_Book_Review_Three_roads_to_quantum_gravity_Basic_Books_2001